Discussion about this post

User's avatar
KK's avatar

Shiny Happy Rambles (mostly) – Mammoth Game for the Stars

1. Nils Lundkvist coughed up the puck right in front of the stars net less than 30 seconds into the game and nothing came of it. Then the Mammoth carried play with pace and purpose for the next four minutes but Oettinger was equal to the task and kept the game knotted at zero. That’s good, right? Or…Oettinger bailed the slow-starting, Stars skaters out early in the game. Both work.

2. The Columbus Blue Jackets hired Rick Bowness as their new head coach on Tuesday and their fans and players seem to be pretty excited about winning their first game under him. They are also amped over his view of how he wants the team to play, including, “When you can play fast, you’re putting pressure on the opposition. I hate playing slow.”

Ummm, wait, what? What did you do with the real Rick?

Then I read more, and Bowness said, “In our league, you don’t score your way into the playoffs. This isn’t the ’80s, man. You defend your way into the playoffs, and you get your offense by playing solid team defense.”

There he is!

The Athletic - “He said he was looking forward to practice Wednesday, when the Blue Jackets will likely get their first full exposure to the system Bowness wants them to play.”

Those poor Columbusonians and the players have no idea what they just signed up for.

3. I really have to start rethinking titling these Rambles under a theme before the game starts because that was not a shiny happy first period.

Smart Side of Brain: “Don’t look at the possession share from that period.”

Less Smart Side of Brain: *looks…regrets doing so immediately.

4. The stars came out in the second period quite unlike the team from the first. They stood up strong at the defensive blue line we're able to make clean breakouts and when they were able to hold on to it in the offensive zone they were able to hold on to it for long stretches. It was refreshing. Then Oettinger made two blue ribbon saves off of Dylan Guenther before having to stop J.J. Peterka in all alone. Then the Benn Faksa-Erne line started mashing pucks at the Mammoth net from all over and almost came away with something good before Vamelka stopped Robertson breaking in all alone.

Repeated push back. Nice to see.

Both teams playing fast, great goaltending, and counter-punches all over. 0-0 but this is fun!

5. Neither team stopped pushing all period as proven by a Mammoth goal with less than seven seconds left after Harley made a nice play at his blue line (I know, right!) to strip the puck from Guenther but Benn just barely missed it with a clearing attempt and the Mammoth scored on a driving tip very few humans on earth could defend.

The Stars trailing 1-0 after two is the same score as it was against the Ducks two nights ago. The weather of the two games may be the same but the climate is vastly different.

6. The Mammoth rank 4th in expected goals for (5v5), and the Stars 22

1st, so this game was going to be an interesting one way or another.

7. The second best power play in the league proves why they are the best power play in the league to make it 1-1 early in the third. If this game is not fun, at least it’s shiny. Nah, it’s fun too.

8. A short time later, Utah takes a usually innocuous shot from the point that Oettinger is partially screened on, he gets a shoulder on it, but the puck Klinko’s 10 feet over his head and into the net. Give the puck some credit, it tried to skitter along the goal line for three feet in an attempt to deny the goal. The post stood firm, denied it's escape, and rejected it back into the net . Weird.

Hockey, y’all.

9. Ten minutes left…2-1 Mammoth…

Utah color commentator: “have we seen a better game all year”

Play by play announcer: “I don't think so.”

Hard to argue. It felt like the playoffs.

10. I have no words for the last 10 minutes of that game. Actually, too many of them.

Both teams played extremely well. Maybe the Mammoth a little better but the Stars never looked out-matched like has been too often the case lately. They put in a full 60 minutes and ran up a team that did likewise.

If the Stars keep doing what they did in this game, good things will follow come playoff time.

John Araki's avatar

I’ve been meaning to write this for about a week. Each time, I talked myself out of it with the same refrain: “Let’s give it one more game—maybe the Stars will invalidate everything I’m about to say.”

Well, it’s been a few games now. While there have been signs of improvement, I still haven’t seen clear evidence that they’re working their way out of this rough patch. So here goes.

This probably isn’t news to anyone, but in short: the Stars have a 5v5 problem. KK and others have pointed to possession metrics and other indicators, and the conclusion is hard to dispute. The new coaching staff seems to have installed more defensive discipline—xGA/60 has improved—but whether you rely on advanced stats or the good old fashioned eye test, it’s tough to argue that the Stars aren’t losing more often than not at 5v5.

Because I apparently enjoy killing brain cells by pondering unanswerable questions, I’ve spent some time thinking about why this might be the case. Hockey is fast and played in a confined 200-foot space. What happens at one end of the ice often directly affects the other, creating a constant chicken-and-egg problem where clean cause and effect is hard to isolate. I don’t have the answer—but I might have a few chickens. Or eggs.

1. Offensive puck retrieval

I wish there were a stat that measured how often a team successfully retrieves the puck and establishes possession in the offensive zone after a dump-in. I’d be very curious to see where the Stars would rank, though my suspicion is they wouldn’t fare well.

Context matters, of course. The Stars are skilled enough to generate offense off the rush, and on some nights that may be sufficient. But we all know that in tightly contested games—especially in the playoffs—you need to be able to put the puck behind the defense and go get it. Whether it’s a lack of speed getting F1 in quickly or simply losing too many board battles, it doesn’t feel like opposing defenses are being forced to work very hard to clear their zone after a dump-in.

2. Offensive possession

Great—we retrieved the puck. Now what? KK, this section is for you. When the Stars do establish possession in the offensive zone, I don’t think they generate enough chaos. And chaos is good. It forces defenders to chase, pulls them out of structure, disrupts assignments, and creates space. Because the roster is loaded with skill (duh), the Stars appear almost pre-programmed to look for the perfect play: the seam pass into the slot, the cross-rink feed to the weak side. When those work, they’re beautiful. The problem is that against a team in a decent defensive posture , those plays are extremely difficult to execute—no matter how skilled your forwards are. Often, you need chaos first to create the opening that skill can then exploit. Right now, the Stars tend to lead with skill. It wouldn’t hurt to balance that with a bit more chaos: pucks to the point, bodies in front, shots through traffic. Wing it at the net. Create a mess. Then grab the rebound, make the deft pass, and elevate to finish. Shoot the puck and get interior, as Razor would say.

3. Neutral zone

I don’t have much to add here beyond one observation from the past few games: the Stars’ gap control looks almost nonexistent. Opponents seem to have far too much space through the neutral zone. Whether it’s forwards not tracking back or defensemen not stepping up aggressively, teams are consistently hitting the blue line with speed—or, at minimum, getting clean dump-ins that go deep. Clogging the neutral zone doesn’t seem to be a thing right now.

4. Defensive zone

To be clear, I do think the defensive coverage system implemented by the new coaching staff has helped. The Stars aren’t chasing nearly as much in their own end, and after some early-season growing pains, major coverage breakdowns have become relatively uncommon.

That said, they still get hemmed in their zone more often than you’d like, and to me that’s largely a personnel issue. Simply put, the current D-corps feels physically outmatched. Against heavy forechecking teams, the Stars struggle—and that will matter even more in playoff hockey.

Miro and Harley can mitigate this with skating and puck movement, and Esa is skilled and strong enough to compete. Beyond that, though, the depth becomes an issue. Capobianco skates and moves the puck well but can struggle defending the interior. Lyubushkin and Petrovic play smaller than their size. Lundkvist, in my view, has had a particularly rough stretch.

I know a top-six winger is at the top of most trade-deadline wish lists, but for my money, adding another legitimate top-four defenseman is the higher priority.

This ended up much longer than I intended. If you’ve made it this far, thanks for reading. It was cathartic to get all of that off my chest. Feel free to comment, disagree, flame, or ignore entirely. I’ll try to keep my mouth shut for the foreseeable future... ;)

21 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?