Discussion about this post

User's avatar
KK's avatar

Keeping faith in Starsland hasn't come easily this year.

It's always easy to be a critic, especially at arm's length. A blip here or there should be expected and accepted in any hockey season. Losing streak, schmoozing streak. The team has won three straight games.

Looking at the underlyings (several of them) instead of the overall record is not fun, however. Forget about the Stars absolutely needing their power play to beat the 31st-place Blues twice in a row, or giving up three-goal deficits in the third period two games in a row. Those things aren't great but they are the least of what the Stars need to address if they are to be successful in the postseason. And, success in the postseason was the primary premise for a shift in system philosophies this year.

This is just one small aspect and there are many more...but let's just look briefly at play with a man advantage versus five-on-five play. The latter of which constitutes about 75-80% of every NHL game. A state of play more common in the playoffs, at first glance, anyway. (The penalty rates in the playoffs are actually much the same as during the regular season. Or have been for several years now.)

The difference being the severity of what is called in the playoffs as a penalty are much more lenient than what is called during the regular season. The Stars are not an aggressive team. They are among the lowest in hits delivered (also an indicator of a team that doesn't have the puck very much, so yes that's another caveat). Having said that, a team that is less aggressive is more likely to lose the "even-up-calls-so-as-not-to-influence-the-game" penalty balance BS that happens during the NHL playoffs.

Or put more simply, the Stars hoping for ticky-tack calls and relying on their power play to bail them out is less likely to succeed in the playoffs than during the regular season. Touch calls always go in favour of the team who has been committing felony assault on their opponents while their own ticky-tack fouls get dismissed because: Ogie Oglethorpe on their team already spent 5 minutes in the box for driving someone's face into the boards. (It wouldn't be fair to the assaulting team or to poor Ogie to call a judicious game. Things have to be even-Steven in the playoffs, at all costs.)

*cough, "Florida Panthers" cough, vomit, cough*

That's a lot of words to say..."Oh boy, that doesn't bode well for the Stars."

This season, the Stars power play has been elite with a capital E. That's good. At 5v5, the Stars offense has been embattled with an even bigger E.

Here are the Points per 60 Minutes (P/60) Ranks at 5v4 versus 5v5:

Stars 5v4 Ranks -

Out of all the players who have played at least 50 minutes during a five-on-four situation, the Stars have FOUR out of the top 12 players in the league. It's kind of crazy. Bananas, really, to have 33 percent of the top 5v4 scorers on one team. I’m sure you can guess who those players are: Rantanen, Robertson, Hintz, and Johnston.

The first power play unit is special together.

Stars 5v5 Ranks -

At a minimum of 200 minutes played 5v5, the P/60 ranks of the Stars', umm, Stars is much less rosy. Here are the top six Stars rankings at P/60 @ 5v5:

28. Benn

43. Rantanen

58. Robertson

136. Johnston

149. Seguin

211. Hintz

You'll notice that two of those players have played at least 13 years with the Stars, one is injured and the other is a 3rd or fourth liner.

The Stars elite power play performers have not been elite during the most common state of the game. There are four active players in the top 200. That could become a problem in the playoffs.

As a measuring stick, the Golden Nights have four players in the top 30. The Stars next opponent, who some dismiss as an also-ran, the Mammoth have 5 in the top 40. The Senators (ughh...) have 6 in the top 100.

As a ridiculously unattainable measuring stick, the Colorado Avalanche have 14 players in the top 200. Fourteen as opposed to four.

What happens the next time Roope Hintz gets his foot severed from his ankle in a playoff game, and then has the same thing attempted in the game he returns without the Stars getting one power play out of it?

The Simple Answer to the 5v5 Scoring Situation:

IDK, man! IDK.

The only thing I do know is I am tempering my expectations of this team but am still hanging on to the hope being sold in the points column. It seems the league-wide pundits hold onto similar hopes. The problem is they mostly look at the standings instead of watching the games.

Maybe I should follow their lead. It seems to be a more peaceful outlook, at the very least.

Cathy Weinblatt's avatar

I would love a game where we had a substantial lead and kept it.

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?